Reality of wildlife

​Increasing poaching pressure and shrinking habitats and economies in African countries have led to a growing consensus among

conservationists and international conservation organizations that the American model, commonly referred to as the fences-and-fines approach, has failed to protect wildlife on that continent the fences-and-fines approach (the American National Park model) to wildlifeprotection is now perceived by many conservationists to have failed in Africa. An alternative

approach whereby rural communities are given ownership rights or custodianship and managementresponsibilities for the resource has been introduced under the name Community-based WildlifeManagement (CWM) (also known as Community-Based Conservation or CBC). This newapproach is currently under experimentation in many parts of Africa. It is based on a number ofassumptions, one being that the communities are interested and willing to conserve wildlife on their

lands. 

..Our question is today is that.

(We African countries we encourage the community to participate willingly in conservation,but have asked our self if the cost they pay is covered with  benefits they get from conservation?

Look at the cost the community they incurred.

1.crops damages

2.disturbances from wildlife

3.killing of livestocks

Etc.

Does the policy makers consider all this in order to encourage good neighborhood with natives?

Leave a Reply